Pages

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Legal Podcast Review

Throughout my time at Full Sail University, I have gained valuable advice on things I need to do or keep in mind in order to build a small business. I found a podcast from Stanford University's Entrepreneur Corner with DLA Piper partner Martin Nichols. Stan Christensen, Stanford lecturer and Arbor Advisors Managing Director, interviewed Nichols about legal advice for start-up companies. Nichols brought up many great points that I found useful to help me in my search for the right attorney. According to Nichols, initial questions people should ask when searching for an attorney is where did they practice law and are they an equity partner? Those aren't the only two important pieces of information needed though. Find a referral and ask that person what their dealings with the attorney have been: did the make good judgment calls, did they get the deal done, are they as valuable as they claim? Also think about who you deal goes to, does the attorney get personally involved, hand it off to an associate, or get too involved and therefore increase fees? If they are a large firm, will they make time for your start-up business? Nichols tells anecdotes that help convey his points. He discusses that you want an attorney who you can trust, who will listen to you, who has experience in the start-up area, and who doesn't get emotionally involved.
To view this podcast go to Stanford's Entrepreneur Corner.

The next podcast I found was a lecture by Keith Weinstein at MIT discussing Copyright Applied to Music and Computers: Peer-to-Peer File Sharing. I chose this lecture because it breaks down the area of copyright that has been infringed upon for years. He thoroughly breaks down copyright law using everyday examples. I need to be aware of copyright when building my business because I'm using other people's work to run my website. If I don't get a license, I'll be broadcasting artist's music videos, breaking the copyright performance clause. Weinstein breaks down what it means to buy copyrighted material for personal use versus broadcasting it to an audience. He also discusses mp3.com and their copyright infringement case where they allowed people to have a copy of the music, claiming the person has the original CD, so it's not an issue. They later went out of business because they were found to have reproduced material, which is in violation of copyright law.
To watch this podcast visit Copyright Applied to Music and Computers.

The final podcast I watched can be found on iTunesU titled Anatomy of a Record Breaking Trademark Victory. I decided to view an actual case, involving trademark because I need to be careful about trade marking logos for my company and not infringing on anyone else. This example helps put into perspective how serious trademark infringement is and what can happen during a court case. The speaker is R. Charles Henn, Jr. speaking in front of UNC's law school. His case involved his client Adidas versus Payless. Adidas claimed that Payless copied Adidas' signature three-stripe pattern with a four stripe pattern as well as other similarities. Henn says that Payless is "the world's largest retailer with 5,000 stores in the United States." Based on that fact and their revenue, Henn revealed that Adidas was awarded $300 million at the conclusion of the case. There were 268 styles of shoes involved in the case. Henn says that the interesting part of this case was that Payless relied on the advice of counsel if they should produce the shoes and their attorney's gave them the green light to produce. Payless sold $400 million worth of their knockoffs, so Henn feels that what Adidas was awarded was still low. When discussing the case, Henn says that they needed to focus on is the question "is this infringement? is the mark strong?" Henn also used a commercial tactic and included the commercials as evidence. The first commercial he showed was of a game show asking the teams which of four brands used three stripes. It's consumer knowledge that it's Adidas and any shoes that look similar will be thought to be Adidas. It's the visual marking that makes Adidas recognizable. They also showed athletes that use Adidas to show how revered the show company is to not only everyday consumers, but also to athletes.

All of the podcasts helped me to gain a better understanding of considerations I need to build my company. I need to be aware of the attorney I'm choosing as well as avoiding any copyright and trademark issues. My attorney needs to be able to fit with my company and have an interest in the future of it. When dealing with copyright, I need to get all of the proper licensing and have protections against any kind of file sharing. Lastly, the trademark court case brought up many great points about what I need to avoid when designing items and that owning a trademark is beneficial to protect my brand.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Legal Issues For My Business

Designing a business plan concept has been difficult because I change my mind every other month. Yet, I developed an idea that I believe I’m happy with. My plan is to create a website that streams only music videos. Think Pandora/YouTube cross. Developing a website with other people’s content comes with several liabilities, one being copyright on the Internet. An example of this is the case of Viacom vs YouTube.

In this case, YouTube was alleged to have “distributed illegally copied videos that were uploaded to the site by individual users” (Arcamona, 2010). New York judge, Judge Stanton ruled that YouTube simply has to remove videos that infringe on copyright upon discovery of them. Since 20 hours worth of video gets uploaded every minute, I feel this was a fair ruling. Viacom threatened to appealed. The case called into question the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). DMCA states that producers are not liable under “Safe Harbor.” Also, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that producer’s are not accountable for the comments their users post. Both DMCA and Section 230 provide great arguments for YouTube. Scanning through 28,800 hours of video is impossible to do in a week and assigning someone to the task would be torture. I agree with the ruling, if Viacom is so worried about copyright infringement, then they can police it themselves. If they find something, YouTube will take down the video without a fight.
            
Another area I may be liable in is how I make income. Some sites use ad revenue to pay for their business. Pandora for example, did that, but got in trouble for how their ads were displayed. Fowler Woods LLC vs ten online-radio websites and web applications consisted of Fowler alleging that these sites infringed on a patent for showing ads while audio was playing (Meyer, 2010). One would think anybody could do this, but a team did in fact come up with the idea and protect it, meaning to use this concept, I’d have to pay Fowler Woods LLC and get permission. Seems ridiculous, but it’s true. If you want to investigate the patent, the number is 6,351,736, and it’s titled “System and method for displaying advertisements with played data” (Meyer, 2010).
            
One website that I got inspiration from was Ruckus and their Ruckus Music Player. Ruckus tried to combat the issue of piracy on the web. According to an article published by Reuters, Big Champagne Web consultant’s estimate 1 million free songs are swapped every day (2007). Even though this article was published four years ago, I’m confident that the amount of free songs swapped among peers has quickly grown. People use the Torrent sites frequently, downloading music and movies. It’s the old cliché “If it’s free, it’s for me mentality,” yet it hurts the industry people love. Revenue streams come from elsewhere because music sales are unreliable. Yet, the judicial system still tries to cut down on piracy. In the Pirate Bay Trial, the four men accused were sent to jail and each had to pay $905,000 for copyright infringement. In my business, I need to be extremely careful about gaining permission and what could be downloaded. Being a legitimate site like YouTube gives me the protection I need to grow my business. Torrent has the looming threat of being shut down because of their known dealings distributing copyrighted material.
            
Reviewing these past cases helps to make wise business choices when creating my business. Copyright is a huge issue on the Internet and needs to be taken seriously. I’ve learned that even the smallest details need to be considered so that way I am not sued, like the online-radio sites and applications, because I didn’t know about a patent or trademark previously in place.


Meyer, 2010
Arcamona, 2010
Pirate Bay Trial
Reuters, 2007