Pages

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Google Plus Adds Value To Music Promotion


Everybody is familiar with a company named Google.  A well-known search engine, its name is infamous for searching anything you could ever want to know. Google is not just a search engine though. They are expanding into social media and possibly showing inadequacies of the popular powerhouse Facebook. This short video gives a glance into the social media platform Google Plus that is currently in the testing phase:



According to hypebot.com, Google Plus will provide several features that will differ from Facebook:


Each of these features seems promising. Google Circles sounds like life will be easier searching for and condensing friends. As said in the video, “sometimes its not relevant to talk about certain things with certain people.” Different aspects of your life are now subdivided as you see fit, supplying more privacy and relaying information directly to those who need to know. Another feature to note, Google Hangout, helps solve the issue of groups and group chats. Who isn’t sick of being added to groups they just don’t care about and the emails that go with them after a stranger updates? Plus, it solves the issues with Skype. You talk to who you want, not some stranger who searched your location. Finally Group Huddle eliminates Facebook Instant Chat. If you’re not at your computer, the message goes to your inbox, clogging it with large amounts of small talk. With Huddle, since you can pull exactly who you want from the list or grab a circle, you’re getting information from who you want quickly and efficiently.

Google Plus seems like an innovative idea, restoring a level of privacy, but still remaining interactive. The features organize social media in order to sift out the clutter and useless information. This also seems like a strong social media business platform. The user remains professional and what has been posted to a cluttered wall will not offend the employer or business professional. Facebook has always acted as a casual site for people to let loose and post anything and everything. If you’re friends, you see what has been posted. You try to be friends and the invites pending, you get some access to what that person does. Google Plus revives professionalism in this social media platform design. You can turn on different aspects of yourself to relevant groups, saving face and impressions.

How does this affect the music industry? Circles will help solve the issue of transparency with fans. Artists can group their fans into a broad circle or subdivide people all the way down to City. Adding the feature of Google Hangout provides the transparency fans adore, face-to-face chat time with their beloved artist. This could take video chatting to a whole new level because multiple fans can interact with each other as well. Also, Group Huddle based off of fan circles could be a great promotional tactic per city. Fans could get special opportunities such as, “First person to respond to BLANK question gets a meet and greet with X band.” Promotions can be tailored to cities now, while others don’t have to be bogged down with information that doesn’t affect them.

The downside to all of this is that it will be on Google. As said by my classmate Jalesia Offer, “I don’t want all of my stuff on Google.” Condensing everything may leave you limited from other options. The Internet is constantly changing and new programs are being developed and released rapidly. Maybe Google will get this right or maybe someone else will create the next best thing.

References:


Friday, June 24, 2011

How Grounded Is Cloud Computing Really?


Cloud computing is on the rise and I, like most, have trouble imagining a tangible medium like a cloud that can store my information safely. It’s hard to imagine a giant hard drive in the sky that collects billions of people’s information, yet that’s what’s implied with cloud computing.

To think of it differently, cloud computing isn’t really a giant, hard drive living in a puffy cloud, but alludes to consumers creating content, downloading content, uploading content onto another company’s server. We as consumer therefore save more room on our personal hard drives. Also, it provides back-up files in case our home computers crash. Simply, it’s like an external hard drive shared by the world, yet you can only access your content and not anyone else’s.

Next the question of security arises: if this “external hard drive” is shared by everybody, how protected am I really? There are smart people in the world who love to hack things; can they get access to my personal information? After reading “Demystifying Cloud Computing For Consumers,” they make a point that cloud-computing services like Amazon have a clause about security (2011). The article doesn’t answer the question, and I don’t feel like they can. Only the services using cloud computing (Apple, Google, Amazon) can answer security questions. There’s always a risk using personal information on the Internet, it’s a fact. As long as the cloud companies are doing their best to protect their customers, that’s all that consumers can ask for.

The brand that Apple’s trying to create with cloud computing left me feeling like my information was going someplace mysterious as I looked toward the sky. The explanation of iCloud seemed too high tech. Yet, the concept is more grounded than it sounds. The whole vision of the cloud keeps people in suspense, yet Apple’s always been great about that. Apple is known for their “out-of-the-box,” innovative technology. So continuing to call their product iCloud holds true to Apple. The other cloud companies, Amazon and Google, haven’t pushed cloud computing in people’s faces, but have still made their presence with this new technology known. They have a chance to ground people’s association with cloud computing so consumers aren’t frightened to send their information out. In reality, the information isn’t going out into a space with no boundaries, but to a tangible place controlled by Amazon, Apple, and Google.

For more information visit:

J.K. Rowling Takes Control Of Her E-books


The collection of Harry Potter novels have been out for several years now, and July 2011 will bring the final movie in series, concluding the reign of Harry. J.K. Rowling isn’t giving up her beloved Harry just yet. On July 31, Pottermore will come to life.

Rowling chose July 31, because that’s Harry’s birthday. Pottermore is a website that will hold more content Potter fans haven’t read. It will also let Rowling keep control over her eBooks. Since eBooks became popular, Rowling refused to release digital versions of her novels. Finally, as the movies have all but wrapped up, she adds some final excitement into they Harry hype. She refused to go the traditional distribution route, so Amazon was out. Yet, the eBooks, even though exclusive to Pottermore, are compatible with any eReader. Also, the website will add new life to the stories (which all seven books will be on the site), and be fully interactive with the reader.

On the Pottermore website, Rowling leaves a teaser video, giving thanks to her loyal readership and fans who continue to write to her and love her work. Even though the release date is July 31, the website will not but fully open to the public until October. But some lucky few will get to experience the website early. Just how isn’t revealed on the site. If interested, you can still submit your email address to get a registration notification.

Since deciding to release ebooks, it was a wise choice by Rowling. If she didn’t, she would have been seen as an author stuck in the past. Also, with her timing, it was now or never. Releasing Pottermore around the final movie installment is great to supply more hype, not jus to the movie, but it’s an extension of the monopoly moving into a new medium. If Rowling had released Pottermore later than the final movie, there wouldn’t have been as big of an impact with fans. There doesn’t seem to be a huge impact now either, but this is the last chance to really hype the world of Hogwarts to readers. Creating eBooks sooner, like at the onset of eReaders, would have had more impact because Rowling would have been current with the times. She’ll still get tons of downloads from millions of loyal fans, but people are just about moved on from the series, engaging in new novels.

For more information visit:
http://media.theage.com.au/entertainment/red-carpet/jk-rowling-unveils-pottermore-2449251.html